FIRST LOOK: FUJIFILM XF23mm f2 R WR Fujinon lens

When Fujifilm announced the XF35mm f2 lens, about 10 months ago, a lot of street photographers were very excited! In no time it became one of most popular lenses for the X-series system... And rightly so; its compact size, great image quality, all at a "reasonable" price, made it a no brainer for a lot of the X-shooters with an interest in Street Photography. 

It wouldn't take long before Fujifilm photographers started asking for a 23mm lens in a "similar form factor" as the 35mm f2. And typically for Fujifilm, they do pay attention to its users... 
Today, August 25 2016 the new XF 23mm f2 R WR lens is reality! The announcement didn't come as a complete surprise as it already showed up on the latest X-mount Lens roadmap, a few months ago. 

Fujifilm Middle East, was kind enough to lend me a pre-production copy of the 23mm f2 a bit more than a week ago. Although a bit shorter than normal, I was still able to shoot the lens during a Street Photography walk in Paris and Dubai. All images shown here were shot on a pre-production X-T2 body. Although pretty close to final production, it is still a pre-production copy of the lens and small changes might occur between now and the release date. A new lens firmware is likely to be released over the coming month(s).

23 f2 left - 35 f2 right

The lens is made in Japan and has the typical high quality Fujifilm look and feel. At 52mm it is only marginally taller than the 35mm f2 (46mm) and weighs in at 180g compared to 170g for the 35mm f2. It is significantly smaller and lighter than its older brother, the 23mm f1.4 (63mm / 300g). 

While the aperture ring is identical to the 35mm f2, the focus ring is about 1/3 wider; a very welcome addition for those "hardcore" street photographers which prefer to shoot in manual focus! 

Its overall shape is so close to the 35mm f2, that I did find myself occasionally grabbing the wrong lens. Both lenses also share the same 43mm filter size. 

Just like the 35mm f2, it does not have a depth of field scale on the lens barrel; likely in an effort to keep the lens as compact as possible. Beside the standard black, the lens is also available in silver.

Last but not least, the lens is Weather Resistant (WR); great to go out shooting in the rain/snow as long as the camera body is also Weather Resistant. As of today, the X-T1, X-Pro2 and X-T2 all fulfil that requirement!


The provided lens hood is very different from the 35mm f2 one for two reasons:

  • It has a standard bayonet fitting that clicks into place and not a "screw in the filter thread" solution like the standard one that came with the XF35 f2. Happy with that!
  • Its shape is odd; I've given it some time to get used to it, but I really don't like it. I guess it might just be a personal thing.
The good news is that the optional LH-XF35-2 metal lens hood, of the vented shape, is supposed to work well on the new lens as well. I'll be ordering one asap, although I don't really agree with the steep asking price for a "lens hood"!

During the limited time I had the lens, I've experimented a little with using the 35mm f2 lens hood and vice-versa and did not notice any vignetting. Even without the lens hood the contrast remains very good. All of the colour images shot around Dubai Creek below, have been shot without it... Oops, forgot it at home!

I did not notice any excessive or weird sun-flare effects, which is in-line with the other recent glass from Fujifilm.

Can be summarised in two words; "Very Fast and Silent". Its 3 year old predecessor, the 23mm f1.4, isn't the fastest lens when it comes to autofocus; so it is probably better to compare it to the newer 35mm f2 lens again. 

Shot on a pre-production X-T2 body, I did find it being at least as fast as the 35mm f2 in normal light and noticeably faster in very low light. Today, it is probably the fastest X-series prime I've shot when it comes to autofocus. In all fairness, I did never think the 35mm f2 was a slow lens to start with!

Fujifilm states the following about the lens construction: "The lens consists of ten elements in six groups, including two aspherical elements. The optimum positioning of the aspherical elements, ensures flatness of the image plane, for edge-tot edge sharpness". A bit of a sales pitch, but it pretty much seems to be right on!

If we look back to the 35mm f2 lens, wide open (f2.0), it does suffer a bit from softness in the extreme corners. More details can be found in my review here. The 23mm f2 clearly does not have this and is sharp all the way from its widest f2 aperture. 

Its sweet spot for best centre sharpness seems to be around f4-f5.6; pretty standard for an f2.0 lens. Strange enough at a 1m focus distance, the extreme corners seemed a little softer at mid apertures f4-f5.6 compared to when shooting all the way open (f2) or more closed down from f8 and smaller. Images above and below are SOOC (Straight Out Of Camera) Jpegs, obviously taken on a tripod. Click on the image for full screen view; the top left of each shows the meta data. The zoomed in shot below shows the extreme bottom right corner.

Post publication 05 SEP 2016: Further testing of image corner sharpness has shown different result when an average focus distance is used. Below are two images shot at 2m focus distance. The second image is a 100% zoom into the left bottom corner. A "slightly" sharper at f5.6 (right) compared to f2.0 (left) in the extreme corners is visible; this is in line with most high quality lenses.

One of the items that surprised me most on the lens, is the close minimum focus distance. While Fujifilm has 22cm as a minimum focus distance, I did find it being just over 18cm; yes I did measure from the focal plane to the subject. It is not as close as the great XF16mm f1.4 (my review here) minimum focus distance, but is not far of!

A 35mm equivalent (23mm x.1.5 crop factor) lens will never be the bokeh monster like a longer 90mm or so. However, especially when focussing at the minimum focus distance, the depth of field is limited, as can be seen in the image below. Especially for street photography, I will rarely shoot wide open, as I'm after a larger depth of field.

For the bokeh fans; the circular aperture blades consists of 9 sheets.

XT-2, ISO 500, 1/250, f2.0


First of all, I'm not the guy that will shoot test charts to analyse different kinds of distortion. Practically speaking, I do not see any visible distortion at close focus distance. Image below is a SOOC (Straight Out Of Camera) jpeg shot with the Lens Modulation Optimiser ON.

Shooting tall buildings like these in Dubai, obviously will show the effect of the somewhat wider than standard focal range; but this is easily corrected in Lightroom or other software.


The new 23mm f2 lens will sell for 449,-USD which is 50 USD more than what the 35mm f2 launched at. I guess the fine guys (and girls) in Japan must realise how popular the 35 f2 is! Would have been nice if they could maintain the same 399,-USD price point, but once must recognise that 35mm full frame equivalent lenses tend to be a bit more expensive than the 50mm ones.

You don't need to wait too long to get your copy of the 23mm f2; early October 2016 it should be in most camera stores around the globe.


As I wrote in the introduction, this is pretty much a dream lens for Street Photographers! On a cropped camera body like all of the Fujifilm X-series, a 23mm lens becomes just about exactly 35mm full frame equivalent; depending who you talk this is often referred to as "the focal length for street photography". There is a reason why the hugely popular X-100 series carries that focal length as well! 

A great advantage will also be for the ones using the lens on an X-Pro1 or X-Pro2 body with the Optical Viewfinder (OVF). The shape of this lens obstructs the OVF far less than the "classic" 23mm lens; which again is good news for Street shooters. 

I would also recommend picking up this lens for somebody starting in photography and wanting to learn the craft the proper way. I'm confident that shooters starting off with primes will see their photography improve much faster. Doing it with a 35mm full frame equivalent makes it a great start!


XT-2, ISO 640, 1/250, f5.6

XT-2, ISO 200, 1/50, f5.6

XT-2, ISO 2000, 1/250, f10

XT-2, ISO 200, 1/420, f5.6

XT-2, ISO 200, 1/420, f5.6

XT-2, ISO 200, 1/250, f11

XT-2, ISO 3200, 1/40, f4

XT-2, ISO 320, 1/250, f5.6

XT-2, ISO 500, 1/250, f8

XT-2, ISO 200, 1/250, f6.4

First of all, with every release of a new Fujifilm prime lens, I realise how much more I like shooting primes nowadays. It makes it so much more enjoyable to walk around with a small lens and just zoom with your feet. You'll be amazed how quickly your brain will adapt to a certain focal range. After less than an hour of shooting, you will exactly know where to stand to frame the shot you had in mind. Something that obviously can not be said of a zoom lens, where one changes the focal range continuously.

Anyway back to the 23mm f2 ! As of today, just like with the older 35mm f1.4, the 23mm f1.4 will also remain in production. I guess some people might want the slightly brighter maximum aperture. For my own use on the streets, I don't however see such a reason and will be more than happy with this new f2 lens!

I actually never purchased the 23mm f1.4 as I found the lens a little too large and heavy for street photography anyway. 

In case you are still not quite sure, mine is on order! Thanks Fujifilm.

Feel free to share this blogpost on your blog, forum or social media platform. No prior permission is required. Just make sure you credit  


Jean said…
Hi, Bjorn. Thank you for an great quick look at a piece of optic that a lot of people have been waiting for. You have touched on a lot of the small questions that arise when we have not had the chance to handle or shoot with it yet. What we do know, is how the XF35/2 is, so your close comparison was very useful. Pictures sure are interesting and excellent as always.

My order went in Yesterday. And the X100T will probably see retirement now.

All the best,
Unknown said…

Glad to see a review of the 23 f/2, but why no image quality comparisons to the 23 f/1.4??? I think this review would have been of greater benefit to your readers with the aforementioned comparison, rather than to the 35 f/2.

Otherwise a good article that I enjoyed reading.

Bjorn Moerman said…
Thanks for the feedback Jean...
Bjorn Moerman said…
I can see your point Mike, however as I wrote I do not own the 23mm f1.4. Beside I do not consider the f2 a replacement for the f1.4.
Bob said…
Thanks for the review. I have the 35mm f2 and am a little disappointed to see how much native barrel distortion it has that must be corrected. It's pretty extreme. Did you shoot any RAW to see how much native distortion there is?
Thanks again.
Bjorn Moerman said…
Bob, send you an email with a RAF file.

KeithT said…
Just received mine and yes it is a keeper. The only problem now is the firmware to get the frame lines correctly - which isn't available at the moment.
ReiVersuri said…
Hi, today I have the 35mm f2 and I would like to buy the 23mm f2, make a sense?
Unknown said…
Hi Bjorn. Thanks for the info regarding 23mmf2, I bought my lens a few weeks ago, and now i have a problem i dont know where if its the lens or my camera body xt1, please i need some help because when i shoot especially at night i saw something pinkish on the lower pf the image. You can email me at and
Please i need someone to help me I'm a newbie and it's only my hobby, I just so sad when i saw something that's not good on the picture I shoot. Thanks in advance and hope that you can help me coz I really love photography.

Lyn Santos
Unknown said…
I have an xc 16-50 and wonder if I should get this 23mm f2.
The thing is that with my landscape photos I feel the far object/subjects loose a lot of details so crop is not easy using the 16-50.
It would help me a lot if you can send me a landscape photo in Raf taken with the 23mm f2.Thank you
Anonymous said…
Hi, I just wanna know if this lens is compatible with FujiFilm XT-10? I'm on a budget that's why I couldn't afford the FujiFilm XT-2... Thanks! more power!
Bjorn Moerman said…
Yes, of course all XF lenses are compatible with the X-T10
Unknown said…
I guess you are using very high iso, any iso above 6400 will do that on dark borders because native iso is max 6400, so anything above will do pink/purple artifacts
Unknown said…
It was an answer to Lyn Santos, so your lens is not faulty at all, it's how Fuji X Trans cameras work with non native ISO